Skip to content
SectionLocal and Maps
Reviewed2026-08-01
Words1,620
Sources4
Local and Maps

The local pack: relevance, distance and prominence

The three inputs Google names for local results, what each one responds to, and why no published weighting exists for any of them.

Short answer

Google's help documentation states that local results are based on relevance, distance and prominence. Relevance is how well a profile matches the search, distance is how far the searcher is from the business, and prominence is how well known the business is. No weighting between the three is published, and anyone quoting a percentage split is quoting an opinion survey rather than the system.

The block of map-linked listings that appears above the organic results on local queries is the most valuable surface in clinic search and the one least influenced by a website. It is fed by Business Profiles, and the only authoritative statement about how it works comes from Google's own help documentation, which names three inputs.

Diagram 05 / the three named inputs
RELEVANCE how well the profile matches what was searched DISTANCE not yours PROMINENCE how well known Google names these three. It does not publish their weights. anyone quoting a percentage split is quoting a survey, not the system
Google's own help documentation names relevance, distance and prominence as what local results are based on. It publishes no weighting between them, and no weighting can be derived from the outside. Treat any percentage split you are shown as opinion.

Relevance

Relevance is how well a profile matches what someone searched for. The inputs are the ones you supply: the primary category, additional categories, the services attached to them, the business description, the attributes, and the content of the profile generally. A profile categorised as a beauty salon is a poor match for a query about a medical procedure regardless of what the clinic actually does, and the mismatch is invisible from the inside because the owner knows what the business is.

Relevance is the one input you control most directly, and it is where most clinics have the largest unexploited gap. Categories are chosen once during setup, often by someone who is not clinically trained, and then never revisited as the service mix changes.

Distance

Distance is the gap between the searcher, or the location term they used, and the business. It is geography. You cannot change it, you cannot optimise it, and no amount of content will move a building. What varies is the radius at which you remain competitive, and that is a function of the other two inputs: a strongly relevant and prominent clinic remains eligible further out than a weak one.

This has one practical implication that is frequently ignored. Measuring pack presence from a single location, usually the office, tells you almost nothing. Presence is a field that varies across a map, so it has to be sampled at several points to be described at all.

Prominence

Prominence is how well known the business is. Google's documentation describes it as being informed by information across the web, including links, articles and directories, and states that review count and score factor into local ranking. It is the vaguest of the three and the most frequently over-specified by third parties.

What can be said with confidence is the direction of the mechanism. A business that is referenced consistently across many independent sources is easier to identify and easier to be confident about than one that appears nowhere. What cannot be said is how much any individual source contributes, because that is not published and cannot be derived by observation from outside the system.

On percentage splits

You will see charts assigning percentages to local ranking factors. Those figures come from surveys of practitioners asked for their opinion. They are a useful record of what the industry believes and they are not a measurement of the system. Treat them as sentiment data, cite them as such if you cite them at all, and never plan a budget around a decimal place in one.

SURFACE 02

The local pack

PARTIAL CONTROL
What controls it
  • The accuracy and completeness of the Business Profile behind the listing
  • Primary and secondary categories, and the services attached to them
  • Whether the address, name and phone number match everywhere else
  • The volume, recency and subject matter of reviews the profile attracts
What does not
  • The distance between the searcher and the clinic
  • Whether a pack appears for the query at all
  • How many results the pack shows on a given device
  • Which competitors are eligible in the same radius
How to test it
  • Search the query from a device with location set to the target area
  • Compare the profile's categories against the ones competitors use
  • Check the profile in the Business Profile manager for pending edits
  • Track pack presence per query rather than a single average position

What people mean when they say a pack is competitive

A pack shows a small number of listings, typically three on a phone before expansion. The number of eligible businesses inside a radius therefore determines how hard presence is, and in a dense city centre the number of eligible clinics within a short distance can be very large. The same profile that dominates a suburban query may never appear in a central one, and this is a property of the geography rather than a failure of the profile.

This is why comparing yourself to a clinic three miles away is often meaningless. They are competing in a different distance field for the same query.

Measuring pack presence properly

The method that works is a grid. Pick your priority queries, sample results from several points across the area you actually draw patients from, and record presence and position at each point. The output is a map of where you appear, which is the thing that varies, rather than a single number that averages away the only interesting variable.

  1. List five to ten queries a real patient would type, including at least two without a place name.
  2. Choose sample points across your catchment: the clinic, the town centre, and several outward points in the directions patients travel from.
  3. Record for each point and query: was a pack shown, were you in it, what position, and the date.
  4. Repeat monthly. The change over time is the signal, not any single reading.

Several commercial tools automate grid sampling. They are convenient rather than magic, and the same record can be built by hand for a small clinic in an hour a month.

The levers that actually exist

Given three inputs, one of which is fixed, the work concentrates in two places.

  • Relevance: correct primary category, sensible additional categories, a complete services list, accurate attributes, hours that are right, and a description that states what the clinic does in the words patients use.
  • Prominence: consistent presence across the directories and registers that matter in your sector, a steady flow of genuine reviews with replies, and coverage or references from sources that are independent of you.

Everything else offered as a local ranking service is either one of these two dressed differently or it is a claim about a mechanism nobody outside the system can verify.

Where the website fits

The website is not what the pack ranks, but it is not irrelevant. The profile's website field points at a page, and that page should describe the same business at the same address with the same name. LocalBusiness or MedicalClinic structured data on that page states the entity's identity in a machine readable form, and Google documents the local business markup it reads. Consistency between profile and page is an entity signal, and entity clarity is the prerequisite for everything on the local surface.

Staying inside the guidelines

Google publishes guidelines for representing your business, and the rules that catch clinics most often concern names and addresses. Adding keywords or a location to the business name where they are not part of the real-world name is a violation. So is listing an address that is not staffed during opening hours. Both are common, both carry real risk to the listing, and neither is worth the exposure for a temporary gain.

What a realistic programme looks like

Fix relevance first, because it is fast, free and fully within your control. Then work prominence steadily over quarters, because it accumulates rather than switches on. Then keep measuring across the grid, because the only way to know whether the radius has widened is to have been sampling it before the work started. Local visibility is a maintenance discipline rather than a project.

No commercial links on this page

This article contains no affiliate links, no sponsored placements and no links to any agency, supplier, clinic or commercial brand. Nobody paid for it, nobody previewed it and no directory advertiser had sight of it. This publication does not rank or recommend agencies anywhere on the site.

Nothing here is medical or legal advice. Regulatory material summarises published guidance. Read the source before relying on it. Our full position is in the editorial standards.

Sources

Primary documentation and regulators only. We do not cite opinion surveys as though they were measurements of a system.

Frequently asked questions

What are the local ranking factors and their weights?

Google names relevance, distance and prominence. It publishes no weights. Percentage splits circulating in the industry come from surveys of practitioner opinion, not from measurement of the system, and should be described that way whenever they are quoted.

Can we rank in a town where we have no address?

Not in the local pack for that town in any reliable way, because distance is a real input and a listing requires a genuine staffed location. You can rank organically for content about that area, which is a different surface.

Do reviews affect local ranking?

Google's help documentation states that review count and score factor into local ranking. It does not state by how much, and the mechanism is best understood as one contributor to prominence rather than a dial.

Why do we appear from the office but not from a mile away?

Because distance is an input and pack presence varies across a map. That pattern is normal. The question worth asking is whether the radius is growing or shrinking over months, which requires sampling from the same points repeatedly.

Is it worth paying for a grid ranking tool?

It is convenient and it makes the variation visible, which is its main value. For a single-site clinic the same record can be built manually. For a group with several sites, automation quickly pays for itself in time saved.

The surfaces move. We write when they do.

A short briefing on documented changes to the surfaces clinics are discovered on. One labelled sponsor slot per issue, no rankings, no invented numbers.